1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 68 N.J.
  5. 68 N.J. Super. 54 (1961)
 

CONTINOS v. PARSEKIAN

68 N.J. Super. 54 (1961)

171 A.2d 663

CONSTANTINOS CONTINOS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NED J. PARSEKIAN, ACTING DIRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 24, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph E. Zavesky argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys; Mr. Zavesky, on the brief).

Mrs. Annamay T. Sheppard argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. William O. Barnes, Jr., attorney).

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiff seeks the reversal of a judgment entered in the District Court in favor of defendant in an action in which, pursuant to the provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq., plaintiff sought recovery of damages from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund for personal injuries sustained on June 14, 1958, as a result of being struck by a motor vehicle while he was walking across a public highway...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases