1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 194 F.Supp.
  5. 194 F.Supp. 867 (1961)
 

MAUPIN v. FRY

Civ. No. 3064.

194 F.Supp. 867 (1961)

Joseph H. MAUPIN, Plaintiff v. Carl FRY, Edward Jones, and Crosby Wright, individually and as constituting the Tennessee Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committee, Defendants.

United States District Court Middle District Tennessee, Nashville Division.

June 9, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale M. Quillen and Philip M. Carden, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Fred Elledge, Jr., U. S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for defendants.

William E. Miller, Chief Judge.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff, Joseph H. Maupin, against the defendants, Carl Fry, Edward Jones and Crosby Wright, individually and as constituting the Tennessee Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committee, for a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff has not been legally removed from his office as State Administrative Officer, Agricultural Stabilization Office, that he is still entitled to the rights and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases