1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 189 F.Supp.
  5. 189 F.Supp. 697 (1960)
 

OSTOW & JACOBS, INC. v. MORGAN-JONES, INC.

189 F.Supp. 697 (1960)

OSTOW & JACOBS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MORGAN-JONES, INC., and Aileen Mills Co., Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 17, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Sonnenreich, New York City, for plaintiff.

Burke & Burke, New York City, for defendant Morgan-Jones, Inc., Harold W. Wolfram, George I. Harris, New York City, of counsel.

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Defendant Morgan-Jones, Inc., hereinafter Morgan-Jones, moves for reargument of its motion, which I denied, to dismiss the complaint. The motion was made on the ground that the federal court lacked jurisdiction of the claim against Morgan-Jones. Plaintiff based its opposition to the motion largely on a letter dated May 7, 1959, and I assumed in denying the motion that the claim was supported by the letter. It now appears that that letter was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases