1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 114 S.E.2d
  5. 114 S.E.2d 772 (1960)
 

UPCHURCH v. CITY OF RALEIGH

No. 468.

114 S.E.2d 772 (1960)

252 N.C. 676

W. C. UPCHURCH, on behalf of himself and all other taxpayers of the City of Raleigh v. CITY OF RALEIGH, a municipal corporation.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emanuel & Emanuel, Raleigh, for plaintiff.

Paul F. Smith, William Joslin, Manning & Fulton, Raleigh, for defendant.

DENNY, Justice.

The complaint does not allege any irregularities in the legal procedures followed by the defendant in connection with the adoption of the bond ordinances involved, the publication of such ordinances, the ordinance calling for the bond election on 23 February 1960, or in the conduct of such election.

The plaintiff alleges the series of bonds approved at the election held on 23 February 1960 are not valid and legal obligations of the City of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases