1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 224 Or.
  5. 224 Or. 614 (1960)
 

PRUETT v. LININGER ET AL

224 Or. 614 (1960)

356 P.2d 547

PRUETT v. LININGER ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed October 26, 1960.

Petition for rehearing denied November 22, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Duncan, Medford, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Duncan, Brophy, Wilson & Duhaime, Medford.

Hugh B. Collins and Bernard P. Kelly, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Collins and Redden and Kelly and Kelly, Medford.

Before ROSSMAN, Presiding Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, and KING, Justices.

REVERSED.

GOODWIN, J.

The defendants appeal from a verdict and judgment for Leslie N. Pruett for damages resulting from severe burns inflicted by an electrical trauma in the course of his employment.

Pruett was employed as a construction worker by a partnership engaged in the general contracting business. He was working with concrete in the building of a bridge on a Jackson County road known as Ross Lane. The bridge crossed Jackson Creek parallel to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases