1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 64 N.J.
  5. 64 N.J. Super. 13 (1960)
 

JOY v. FLORENCE PIPE FOUNDRY CO.

64 N.J. Super. 13 (1960)

165 A.2d 191

NATHANIEL P. JOY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. FLORENCE PIPE FOUNDRY CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 14, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).

Miss Ruth Rabstein argued the cause for petitioner-respondent (Messrs. Pellettieri & Rabstein, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

Nathaniel P. Joy filed a petition in the Division of Workmen's Compensation, seeking an award under R.S. 34:15-7 et seq. for permanent injuries resulting from a cerebral hemorrhage allegedly precipitated by his activities while in respondent's employ. After the Division had entered an award in favor of petitioner, respondent filed an appeal to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases