1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 181 Cal.App.2d
  5. 181 Cal.App.2d 573 (1960)
 

LICHENS v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 9970.

181 Cal.App.2d 573 (1960)

5 Cal. Rptr. 539

ROBERT LICHENS, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SISKIYOU COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

June 2, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barr & Messner for Petitioner.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

WARNE, J. pro tem.*

Petitioner was indicted for bribing a witness in violation of section 136 1/2 of the Penal Code. The present proceeding to restrain the superior court, by writ of prohibition, from proceeding with the trial of the action is prosecuted principally upon the ground that the court has no jurisdiction to try the petitioner under said indictment for the reason that petitioner was indicted without reasonable or probable cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases