CAL. VIKING SPRINKLER CO. v. CHENEY

Docket No. 18860.

182 Cal.App.2d 564 (1960)

6 Cal. Rptr. 197

CALIFORNIA VIKING SPRINKLER COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent, v. GEORGE D. CHENEY et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

July 8, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold D. Cutler for Appellants.

Nagle & Vale for Respondent.


TOBRINER, J.

Appellants urge that the evidence in this case fails to support the findings of the trial court enforcing a mechanic's lien for the unpaid balance due upon a written contract for the installation of a pipe system of automatic sprinklers in appellants' apartment house. Appellants claim that the court should have sustained their affirmative defense that respondent fraudulently misrepresented that 483 automatic sprinkler heads would be installed although...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases