1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 221 Or.
  5. 221 Or. 520 (1960)
 

ROSENTOOL v. BONANZA OIL AND MINE CORP.

221 Or. 520 (1960)

352 P.2d 138

ROSENTOOL v. BONANZA OIL AND MINE CORP.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 11, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Mumford, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Hale G. Thompson, Eugene.

Richard Bryson argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Bryson & Bryson, Eugene.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, GOODWIN and HARRIS, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, J. (Pro Tempore)

Plaintiff, Samuel Rosentool, became a stockholder in defendant, an Oregon corporation, in 1954. On April 29 and on April 30, 1957, plaintiff served written demand on defendant that he be permitted to examine the list of shareholders of defendant corporation and to copy such list. Plaintiff's demand was rejected, and thereafter, on June 14, 1957, plaintiff commenced this mandamus proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases