1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 185 F.Supp.
  5. 185 F.Supp. 531 (1960)
 

SPANGLER v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 2390, 2396-2398.

185 F.Supp. 531 (1960)

Elsworth L. SPANGLER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Charles O. SPANGLER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Ronald SPANGLER et al., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Connie SPANGLER et al., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. Ohio, W. D.

June 9, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saxbe, Boyd & Prine, Columbus, Ohio, by Gerald A. Donahue, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Hugh K. Martin, U. S. Atty., H. Donald Hawkins, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dayton, Ohio, for defendant.

WEINMAN, District Judge.

The sole issue involved in this controversy is whether or not a person engaged in training with a National Guard Unit during the two week active duty for training period provided for in Title 10 U.S.C.A. § 672(b) and Title 32 U.S. C.A. § 502(a) is an employee of the United States Government within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b), the Federal Tort Claims Act.1

Title 28 U.S.C.A....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases