1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 31 N.J.
  5. 31 N.J. 592 (1960)
 

IN RE HACKENSACK RECALL ELECTION

31 N.J. 592 (1960)

158 A.2d 505

IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED ERROR IN THE PREPARATION OF THE BALLOT FOR THE RECALL ELECTION IN THE CITY OF HACKENSACK TO BE HELD OCTOBER 6, 1959.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 7, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William A. Wachenfeld argued the cause for the defendants-appellants, Edgar P. Deuell, Peter A. Frapaul, Harry R. Bosshard, Herman S. Ferber and R. Nicholas Voorhis (Mr. Emil M. Wulster, attorney; Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, of counsel).

Mr. Milton Rosenkranz argued the cause for the respondents, Eugene E. Demarest, Henry C. Savino, Walter E. Nowakowski, Fred A. McCullough and Arthur C. Maurello.

Messrs. Chandless, Weller & Kramer, attorneys for the City of Hackensack, Amicus Curiae.

PER CURIAM.

This action was instituted by the respondents in September 1959 to correct an alleged error in the ballot prepared by the City Clerk for a recall election in the City of Hackensack to be held on October 6, 1959, pursuant to R.S. 40:84-12 et seq. The respondents were candidates to succeed the incumbent Hackensack councilmen — the appellants here. R.S. 40:84-16 provides that the same ballot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases