1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 183 F.Supp.
  5. 183 F.Supp. 439 (1960)
 

FRIEOUF v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 37333.

183 F.Supp. 439 (1960)

Joseph FRIEOUF, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Doe One, Doe Two, Doe Three, Doe Four and Doe Five, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. California, S. D.

April 12, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Fried, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Laurence E. Dayton, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

Defendant United States of America has moved pursuant to the provisions of Rule 12(b) (1) and 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U. S.C., for dismissal of this action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), on the grounds that plaintiff's exclusive remedy is afforded by the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, 39 Stat. 742, as amended; 5 U.S.C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases