1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 222 Or.
  5. 222 Or. 395 (1960)
 

BARRY ET UX v. SETO ET UX

222 Or. 395 (1960)

352 P.2d 733

BARRY ET UX v. SETO ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified June 8, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry G. Hoy, Oceanlake, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

W.T. Hollen argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Adams & Hollen, Newport.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, GOODWIN and HOLMAN, Justices.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

HOLMAN, J. (Pro Tempore)

The plaintiffs Berry, in July of 1955, sold a business building composed of four rentals and an adjacent residence in Depoe Bay to defendants Seto. Using approximate figures, the price was $22,000, on which $14,000 was paid down, leaving a balance of $8,000. This balance was due in a series of $500 semiannual installments. Nothing further was paid, and plaintiffs brought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases