1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 214 F.Supp.
  5. 214 F.Supp. 364 (1960)
 

STIEGELE v. BENTLEY & SCHIBELLE TRADING CO.

Civ. No. 3028 PHX.

214 F.Supp. 364 (1960)

Karl E. STIEGELE, Speidel Corporation and Kingsway Company, Plaintiffs, v. BENTLEY & SCHIBELLE TRADING CO., an Arizona corporation, and Langert Bros. Co. Wholesale Jewelry & Supplies, an Arizona corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Arizona.

March 22, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fennemore, Craig, Allen & McClennen, Phoenix, Ariz., Dike, Thompson & Bronstein, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

William Rogers, Jr., for defendant.

BOLDT, District Judge.

The above entitled cause having come on for trial on the 4th day of March, 1960, upon the complaint as amended and the answer, the plaintiffs, appearing by their attorneys of record, and defendant, Bentley & Schibelle Trading Co., appearing by its attorney, William Rogers, Jr., evidence was adduced on behalf of plaintiffs and on behalf of said defendant, Bentley & Schibelle Trading Co., and the cause was submitted to the Court on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases