1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 187 F.Supp.
  5. 187 F.Supp. 381 (1960)
 

FINLIN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY

Civ. No. 431-57.

187 F.Supp. 381 (1960)

Thomas J. FINLIN, Charles H. Hogentogler and Darrell L. Middleton, Plaintiffs, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

August 3, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Powell & Davis, by James M. Davis, Jr., Mt. Holly, N. J., John A. Matthews, Newark, N. J., of counsel, for plaintiff.

Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read, by F. Morse Archer, Jr., Camden, N. J., for defendant.

MADDEN, District Judge.

On May 18, 1951, plaintiffs Finlin, Hogentogler and Middleton filed an amended complaint in this Court, in Civil Action 457-51, joining one Arthur F. Naylor as parties plaintiff. Naylor had previously filed a complaint on May 4, 1951 against the defendant, Pennsylvania Railroad Company, for an accounting and damages arising out of an alleged breach of a collective bargaining agreement. The claim concerned his operation of defendant's locomotives...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases