1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 62 N.J.
  5. 62 N.J. Super. 476 (1960)
 

ARMANIACO v. CRESSKILL

62 N.J. Super. 476 (1960)

163 A.2d 379

GEORGE ARMANIACO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF CRESSKILL, DEFENDANT, AND D. STAMATO & CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 11, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Eugene L. Dinallo argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Heller & Laiks, attorneys; Mr. Eugene L. Dinallo, of counsel).

Mr. William V. Breslin argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Francis B. Rusch, on the brief).

Mr. William E. Bannon argued the cause for defendant-respondent, Borough of Cresskill.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and HANEMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.A.D.

Defendant D. Stamato & Co., Inc. (Stamato) appeals from a judgment of the Law Division in favor of plaintiff, a citizen and taxpayer of the Borough of Cresskill (borough), setting aside a resolution of said borough awarding a contract for the construction of a section of a municipal sewer system to it.

Prior to October 7, 1959 the borough advertised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases