1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 11 Wis.2d
  5. 11 Wis.2d 525 (1960)
 

GLODOWSKI v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

11 Wis.2d 525 (1960)

GLODOWSKI, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 1, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Otto & Bird, attorneys, and Arnold C. Otto and John D. Bird, Jr., of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Arnold C. Otto and John D. Bird, Jr.

For the respondent Industrial Commission the cause was argued by Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was John W. Reynolds, attorney general.

For the respondents Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Universal Rundle Corporation there was a brief by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell, attorneys, and Clayton R. Hahn of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Hahn.

BROWN, J.

Appellant contends that the finding, "The silicosis from which the applicant suffers is nondisabling in nature" is not such a finding as sec. 102.18, Stats., demands. He insists that to be valid the findings must contain more detail to demonstrate that the silicosis is nondisabling and, as it stands, the so-called finding is not a finding of fact but is a mere conclusion. The details which appellant wants are evidentiary facts upon which the ultimate fact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases