STERN v. CARROLL


28 Misc.2d 507 (1960)

Gerald E. Stern, Appellant, v. Lottie Carroll, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 2, 1960


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glasser, Baily & Litwack (Arthur W. Baily of counsel), for appellant. Mortimer Getzels and Maurice A. Reichman for respondent.

HECHT and AURELIO, JJ., concur; HOFSTADTER, J. P., concurs for reversal but dissents from direction of final order and votes for a new trial.


Per Curiam.

The need to bring repeated summary proceedings for nonpayment of rent establishes prima facie a violation of the substantial obligation to pay the rent when due, even though, by reason of payment after the proceedings have been begun, they do not eventuate in final orders in favor of the landlord (Stern v. Harrold, 12 Misc.2d 73). The requirement of a 10-day...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases