1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 63 N.J.
  5. 63 N.J. Super. 430 (1960)
 

FUESSEL v. CADILLAC BAR CORP.

63 N.J. Super. 430 (1960)

164 A.2d 821

RUDOLPH FUESSEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CADILLAC BAR CORP. AND JOHN PANASOWICH, ALSO KNOWN AS JOHN PANN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 31, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward A. Costigan argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

Mr. Nathan N. Finkle, argued the cause pro se.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

Defendant Panasowich appeals from the award by the Mercer County Court of a judgment against him in the sum of $2,109 with interest and costs in favor of the petitioner, attorney of the plaintiff, on an application for the fixing and enforcement of an attorney's lien pursuant to N.J.S. 2A:13-5. Defendant asserts the matter was erroneously treated as a summary proceeding and determined without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases