1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 223 Md.
  5. 223 Md. 247 (1960)
 

ARUNDEL CORPORATION v. HALTER

[No. 14, September Term, 1960.]

223 Md. 247 (1960)

164 A.2d 279

ARUNDEL CORPORATION, ETC. v. HALTER

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 14, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald C. Sponseller, with whom were Stanford Hoff and Sponseller & Hoff on the brief, for the appellant.

Ralph G. Hoffman, with whom was Robert J. Cooke on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The suit before us had been on the docket of the Circuit Court for Carroll County without being tried for more than eight successive terms, and the court, interpreting its rule to require such action, ordered it abated. The plaintiff appeals.

Rule 14 of the Circuit Court for Carroll County provides that "The Clerk shall, also prepare and keep a Stet Docket, and shall enter thereon at the end of each term of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases