1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 188 F.Supp.
  5. 188 F.Supp. 259 (1960)
 

WOODNER v. SANKIN

Civ. A. No. 878.

188 F.Supp. 259 (1960)

Ian WOODNER, Plaintiff, v. Julius SANKIN and Joseph A. Garfield, Defendants.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

October 19, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Earnest and James D. Newton, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Arthur M. Chaite, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The defendants move to dismiss the complaint at the close of the plaintiff's case. It appears from the evidence introduced in his behalf that the plaintiff, Ian Woodner, acting through an agent, Woodner remaining at the beginning as an undisclosed principal, entered into an option agreement on October 9, 1957, with the defendants, by which the defendants granted an option to the plaintiff to purchase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases