1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 193 F.Supp.
  5. 193 F.Supp. 249 (1960)
 

UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA

Civ. No. 8030.

193 F.Supp. 249 (1960)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA and Rome Cable Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. New York.

November 8, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore F. Bowes, U. S. Atty., Syracuse, N. Y., Samuel Karp, Edna Lingreen, Michael H. Gottesman, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Bergson & Borkland, Washington, D. C., Herbert A. Bergson, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for Aluminum Co. of America.

Ferris, Hughes, Dorrance & Groben, Utica, N. Y., Robert Groben, Utica, N. Y., of counsel, for Rome Cable Corp.

BRENNAN, Chief Judge.

This is an anti-trust action. The burden of the complaint is to the effect that the acquisition by Aluminum Company of America of the stock and business assets of the Rome Cable Corporation may lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 18. The litigation gives every indication of being complex in the issues involved, complicated and lengthy in the evidence to be produced....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases