1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 33 N.J.
  5. 33 N.J. 404 (1960)
 

BOROUGH OF FANWOOD v. ROCCO

33 N.J. 404 (1960)

165 A.2d 183

BOROUGH OF FANWOOD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. ANTONIO ROCCO AND DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 7, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alfred C. Clapp argued the cause for the appellant Antonio Rocco (Messrs. Hetfield & Hetfield, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel B. Helfand, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the appellant Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. Max L. Rosenstein argued the cause for the respondent Borough of Fanwood (Mr. William M. Beard, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control reversed the Borough of Fanwood's denial of Antonio Rocco's request for transfer of his licensed premises and the Director's action was, in turn, reversed by the Appellate Division. See 59 N.J.Super. 306 (1960). We granted certification on application of the Division and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases