1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 31 N.J.
  5. 31 N.J. 378 (1960)
 

STATE v. BUFFA

31 N.J. 378 (1960)

157 A.2d 694

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES BUFFA AND PHILIP CAREY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 25, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Archibald Kreiger, Legal Assistant to Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. John G. Thevos, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Walter H. Gardner, Jr., argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. David J. Caliri and Joel Mangel, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction of the defendants is affirmed for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, 51 N.J.Super. 218 (App. Div. 1958), with a qualification to be expressed.

Reference is made in the opinion to defendants' complaint about certain comments of the prosecutor in his summation to the jury. The conclusion reached was that none of the criticized remarks, including one which was objected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases