1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 400 Pa.
  5. 400 Pa. 6 (1960)
 

ENFIELD v. STOUT

400 Pa. 6 (1960)

Enfield, Appellant, v. Stout.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 23, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph N. Cascio, with him Paul E.C. Fike, and Fike and Cascio, for appellants.

Frank S. Lucente, for defendant, appellant.

Frank A. Orban, Jr., for appellee.

Before JONES, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, BOK and EAGEN, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE EAGEN, May 23, 1960:

This matter involves two appeals in separate actions, arising out of an automobile accident, which were consolidated for the purpose of trial in the court below.

The first case presented in the lower court was that of the Stouts against Donald Lee Enfield. Plaintiffs put in their case. Defendant (the additional defendant, as such, has no interest in this appeal) moved for a compulsory nonsuit and, it being denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases