1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 185 F.Supp.
  5. 185 F.Supp. 219 (1960)
 

PERTH AMBOY NATIONAL BANK v. BRODSKY

185 F.Supp. 219 (1960)

PERTH AMBOY NATIONAL BANK, a banking corporation, organized under the laws of the United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Irving BRODSKY, Bernard H. Kayden, Herbert J. Kayden, and Henry Smith, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 20, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peckerman, Fisher, Gleiberman & Ezrine, New York City, for plaintiff; David Fisher, Fred I. Sonnenfeld, New York City, of counsel.

Goldwater & Flynn, New York City, for defendants; Monroe Goldwater, Bernard Katz, New York City, of counsel.

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Defendants, by order to show cause signed and served on July 11, 1960, move that an order entered June 30, 1960 be vacated and a new order entered which shall include a certificate, in accordance with section 1292(b) of title 28 U.S.Code, that the court is of the opinion that the order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases