HENRIOD, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment for defendant in a boundary line case. Affirmed with costs to defendant.
Nub of this case is whether the court, as fact arbiter1 erred in concluding that one of the courses of contiguous tracts had been established under the so-called doctrine of "boundary by acquiescence."
In reviewing under recognized rules2 we can say that defendant in 1937 owned and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.