1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 181 F.Supp.
  5. 181 F.Supp. 195 (1960)
 

UNITED STATES v. GUTERMA

Cr. No. 45999.

181 F.Supp. 195 (1960)

UNITED STATES of America v. Alexander GUTERMA et al., Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

February 23, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U. S. Atty., East. Dist. of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., for the United States.

Richard H. Wels, New York City, for defendants Alexander L. Guterma and Chatham Corp.

Emanuel Eschwege, New York City, for defendant Robert J. Eveleigh.

Joseph A. Tracy, New York City, for defendant Virgil D. Dardi.

Frederick H. Block, New York City, for defendant Comficor, Inc.

BYERS, District Judge.

A rehearing of the motion decided on December 16, 1959, was had on February 8, 1960, at the instance of the United States, as to so much of that decision as provided for four separate trials of the matters alleged in the superseding indictment.

All papers, pro and con, were filed on the 17th inst.

It is not my view that the joinder of the several offences and the defendants was contrary to the provisions of Rule 8 of the Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases