1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 59 N.J.
  5. 59 N.J. Super. 306 (1960)
 

FANWOOD v. ROCCO

59 N.J. Super. 306 (1960)

157 A.2d 712

BOROUGH OF FANWOOD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. ANTONIO ROCCO AND DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 26, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max L. Rosenstein argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. William M. Beard, attorney).

Mr. Samuel B. Helfand, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. George F. Hetfield argued the cause for the respondent Antonio Rocco (Messrs. Hetfield and Hetfield, attorneys).

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

The Borough Council of Fanwood unanimously denied Antonio Rocco's application for a place to place transfer of his plenary retail distribution ("package store") license. Rocco appealed to the Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control who reversed and ordered the granting of the transfer. Fanwood appeals.

Fanwood is a residential community whose boundaries form a rectangle roughly a mile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases