1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 223 Or.
  5. 223 Or. 136 (1960)
 

STEWART v. PULIDO

223 Or. 136 (1960)

354 P.2d 298

STEWART v. PULIDO

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed July 20, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Ronchetto, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Earl A. Fewless, Portland.

Walter J. Cosgrave, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Maguire, Shields, Morrison, Bailey & Kester, and Winfrid K. Liepe, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and MILLARD, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. There was a verdict and a judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The sole assignment of error is directed at the instructions to the jury, it being contended that the instructions imposed upon plaintiff a burden of proof more onerous than he was legally required to carry.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases