TOTH v. SILBERT

Civ. A. No. 36089.

184 F.Supp. 163 (1960)

Richard TOTH, Plaintiff, v. Samuel H. SILBERT et al., Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

On Motions to Supplement Findings and to Amend Judgment June 24, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Ralph Hertz, Hertz & Kates, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

John T. Corrigan, Pros. Atty. of Cuyahoga County by Thomas L. Osborne, 2d., First Asst. County Prosecutor, Bernard J. Stuplinski, Ass't County Prosecutor, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

Before WEICK, Circuit Judge, and JONES and KALBFLEISCH, District Judges.


On Plaintiff's Motions to Supplement Findings and to Amend Judgment June 24, 1960.

KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.

This complaint, filed on April 27, 1960, asks the Court to enjoin the prosecution of the plaintiff herein in a criminal case known as State of Ohio v. Richard Toth, Case No. 71586, now pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, on the ground that the plaintiff has been and is being denied due process of law and equal protection of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases