1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 62 N.J.
  5. 62 N.J. Super. 250 (1960)
 

EULE v. EULE MOTOR SALES

62 N.J. Super. 250 (1960)

162 A.2d 601

ALICE EULE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EULE MOTOR SALES AND RUSSELL A. BOERTZEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 6, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William V. Breslin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. William J. Scanlon on the brief).

Mr. Edward C. Hillis argued the cause for defendant-respondent Russell A. Boertzel (Messrs. Marley, Winkelried & Hillis, attorneys).

Mr. William R. Morrison argued the cause for defendant-respondent Eule Motor Sales (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys).

Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff suffered personal injuries when a motor vehicle owned by Eule Motor Sales, a partnership, and operated by her husband Joseph Eule, collided with an automobile owned and operated by Russell A. Boertzel in Fairlawn, New Jersey. Joseph Eule was a general partner in Eule Motor Sales.

Plaintiff instituted this action against Eule Motor Sales and Boertzel; the partners, Joseph Eule and Arthur McKeever...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases