1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 228 Or.
  5. 228 Or. 76 (1960)
 

CROFT ET AL v. LAMBERT

228 Or. 76 (1960)

357 P.2d 513

CROFT ET AL v. LAMBERT

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed November 30, 1960.

Petition for rehearing denied December 28, 1960.

Motion to dismiss appeal to allowed September 5, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willis A. West, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Charles E. Raymond, District Attorney, Portland.

Larry Landgraver, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Leo Levenson, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.

Motion to dismiss appeal to United States Supreme Court allowed September 5, 1961.

REVERSED.

GOODWIN, J.

The defendant sheriff of Multnomah County appeals from a circuit court decree which restricts the sheriff in the administration of his office.

The precise question is whether the sheriff may lawfully forbid his deputies and other employes to engage in off-duty employment. The controversy has been popularly referred to as "the moonlighting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases