LAMOREAUX v. LAMOREAUX


225 Or. 35 (1960)

357 P.2d 273

LAMOREAUX v. LAMOREAUX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed November 23, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Thomas Gooding and S.H. Burleigh, La Grande, argued the cause for the appellant. With Gooding on the brief were Burleigh & Carey, La Grande, and Edward E. Grant, Enterprise.

Robert V. Chrisman, Enterprise, and Teunis J. Wyers, Hood River, argued the cause for the respondent. With Wyers on the brief were Chrisman & Ricker, Enterprise.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and KING, Justices.


REVERSED.

SLOAN, J.

Plaintiff was awarded a decree of divorce. Defendant appeals. Defendant did not counter-claim. She has sought only to avoid the divorce. This appeal presents one issue: Did plaintiff prove that defendant was guilty of such cruelty as to render his life burdensome?

Plaintiff has been a professional forester. His working life has been consecrated, with unfailing zeal, to gain material and professional success in his career. He became...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases