1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 221 Or.
  5. 221 Or. 33 (1960)
 

SMITH ET AL v. TREMAINE ET UX

221 Or. 33 (1960)

350 P.2d 180

SMITH ET AL v. TREMAINE ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 16, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam F. Speerstra, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra and Richard W. Sabin, Salem.

Thomas D. McMahon, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was R.N. Kavanaugh, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, ROSSMAN, O'CONNELL and HOLMAN, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

HOLMAN, J. (Pro Tempore)

Narcissus V. Day died intestate February 23, 1936, leaving as an estate the real property here in controversy which had been her family home. Her estate was never probated. She was survived by six children. The Smiths and the Days, who are plaintiffs herein, represent the interests of five of these children, and the defendant, Hattie Tremaine, is the sixth child. The other defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases