1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 183 F.Supp.
  5. 183 F.Supp. 61 (1960)
 

MITCHELL v. BALTIMORE & ANNAPOLIS RAILROAD COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 11013.

183 F.Supp. 61 (1960)

James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, v. BALTIMORE & ANNAPOLIS RAILROAD COMPANY.

United States District Court D. Maryland, Civil Division.

April 22, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morton I. Schwartzman, Baltimore, Md., Stuart Rothman, Washington, D. C., Howard W. Fineshriber, Chambersburg, Pa., for plaintiff.

C. H. Johns, Washington, D. C., Leon H. A. Pierson, U. S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Joseph I. Huesman, Baltimore, Md., for defendant.

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The question in this case is whether the Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad Company is wholly or only partially exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (Wage & Hour), 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. A brief history of the Company is of local interest and is important to an understanding of the respective contentions of the Secretary and the Company.

Prior to 1900 the Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases