1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 11 Wis.2d
  5. 11 Wis.2d 231 (1960)
 

ZSCHOCK v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

11 Wis.2d 231 (1960)

ZSCHOCK, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Defendants: DAIGLE, Guardian, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 4, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Backus, Waters & McClelland of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Douglas J. McClelland.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Milton S. Padway of Milwaukee.

FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Rebutting the presumption of legitimacy. The record contains substantial credible evidence tending to prove that Albert was the father of Gail and Susan. The testimony of their mother and the birth records have been mentioned, and the latter are made presumptive evidence by sec. 328.09 (1), Stats. See also sec. 327.18 (1). There was evidence tending to show that Albert considered himself the father. Lucy's testimony as to his sending money...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases