1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 185 F.Supp.
  5. 185 F.Supp. 43 (1960)
 

RITTER v. HILO VARNISH CORPORATION

185 F.Supp. 43 (1960)

Edward RITTER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HILO VARNISH CORPORATION and William E. Fierman, John G. Legg, William C. Miller and Albert C. Leguori, its officers and directors, and Carpenter-Morton Company, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 3, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Molloy & Fletcher, Manhasset, N. Y., Robert V. Rafter, Manhasset, N. Y., of counsel, for plaintiff.

Bannister, Stitt, Holloway & Krause, New York City, Lemuel Bannister, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for defendant Hilo Varnish Corporation.

HERLANDS, District Judge.

As the title of this action indicates, it has been brought by "Edward Ritter, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated." It is brought against Hilo Varnish Corporation, four of its officers and directors, and a sixth defendant, said to be the parent of Hilo.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was and is a stockholder of Hilo, owning 126 shares of its common stock; that the plaintiff brings this action on behalf...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases