1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 220 Or.
  5. 220 Or. 5 (1960)
 

GUMM v. HEIDER

220 Or. 5 (1960)

348 P.2d 455

GUMM v. HEIDER

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 13, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman K. Winslow, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were George Neuner, McMinnville, and W.C. Winslow, Salem.

Edward L. Clark, Jr., Salem, and Robert G. Ringo, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief were James W. Walton, Corvallis, and Marsh, Marsh & Dashney, McMinnville.

Before LUSK, Presiding Justice, and WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, CRAWFORD and MILLARD, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for $25,000 general damages and $5,000 punitive damages, and the defendant has appealed.

The following, we believe, is a sufficient statement of the facts for an understanding of the questions raised by the assignments of error.

On July 15, 1953, the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases