1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 357 P.2d
  5. 357 P.2d 1022 (1960)
 

STATE v. LAYMAN

No. A-12977.

357 P.2d 1022 (1960)

STATE of Oklahoma, Plaintiff in Error, v. Andrew H. LAYMAN, Jr., Defendant in Error.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

December 14, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Robert D. Simms, County Atty., Tulsa County, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

R.L. Davidson, Jr., James G. Davidson, Tulsa, J.A. Rinehart, El Reno, for defendants in error.

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

A.H. "Herb" Layman, Thomas Clinton Layman, and Andrew H. Layman, Jr., on March 15, 1960 were indicted by a grand jury in Tulsa County, and charged with having "obtained money by means of false pretenses in violation of Title 21 O.S.Supp. 1953, Section 1541." Pertinent portions of such citation read:

"Every person who, with intent to cheat and defraud, shall obtain or attempt to obtain from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases