FLANK OIL CO., a corporation, doing business as Oriental Refining Co., Plaintiff in Error,
v.
TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, doing business as Bay Petroleum Company or Bay Petroleum Corporation, sometimes also known as Broadstone Corporation, et al., Defendants in Error.
Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 16, 1960.
Rehearing Denied March 21, 1960.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Max Zall, Creamer & Creamer, Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Hodges, Silverstein, Hodges & Harrington, J. G. Hodges, Martin J. Harrington, Denver, for defendant in error Standard Oil Co. (Indiana).
Ned Looney, Denver, William C. Harvin, Baker, Botts, Andrews & Shepherd, Houston, Tex., for defendant in error Bay Petroleum Corp. and Bay Petroleum Co., a Division of Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
Robert M. Williams, S. E. Floren, Bartlesville, Okl., Gorsuch, Kirgis, Campbell, Walker & Grover, Frederic L. Kirgis, Leonard M. Campbell, Denver for defendant in error Phillips Petroleum Co.
Akolt, Turnquist, Shepherd & Dick, John P. Akolt, Edward G. Taylor, Denver, for defendants in error Sinclair Refining Co. and California Co.
V. P. Cline, Denver, for defendant in error California Co.
Hudiburgh & Ter Borg, Denver, for defendant in error Frontier Refining Co.
William S. Livingston, Holland & Hart, Peter H. Dominick, William C. McClearn, Howard S. Reilly, Denver, for defendant in error Carter Oil Co.
Grant, Shafroth, Toll, Chilson & McHendrie, John F. Shafroth, Denver, for defendant in error Shamrock Oil and Gas Corp.
Booth Kellough, Frank H. Shafroth, for defendant in error Gulf Oil Corp.
Tippit, Haskell & Welborn, Denver, for defendants in error Socony Mobil Oil Co. and Skelly Oil Co.
A. T. Smith, William M. Griffith, Gordon H. Mayberry, Denver, for defendant in error Continental Oil Co.
Holme, Roberts, More & Owen, Donald C. McKinlay, Robert D. Poulson, Denver, for defendant in error Texaco, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.
DOYLE, Justice.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiffs instituted this action pursuant to the Colorado Unfair Practices Act, C.R.S. '53, 55-2-1 et seq., seeking temporary and permanent injunctive relief against alleged violations of the Act. Following filing of the complaint which named all of the defendant oil companies as defendants, the matter was set for hearing on the several defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
