SKOLNICK v. SKOLNICK


24 Misc.2d 1077 (1960)

Ruth Skolnick, Plaintiff, v. Nathan Skolnick, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

August 3, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan F. Schilling for plaintiff. Noel W. Hauser for defendant.


MURRAY T. FEIDEN, J.

Plaintiff moves for alimony and counsel fees pendente lite in this separation action. The defendant resists this application by challenging the legality of his marriage to the plaintiff, assigning as his ground the invalidity of a prior Mexican decree of divorce procured by the plaintiff. Plaintiff counters by urging that the defendant induced her procurement of such decree; that he accompanied her to Mexico and paid all the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases