Appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the sole question presented involves a nonreviewable exercise of discretion (Quick Service Novelty Corp. v. Scharf,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MOEBUS v. PAUL TISHMAN CO., INC.
5 N.Y.2d 945 (1959)
Bertrand E. Moebus, Appellant, v. Paul Tishman Co., Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 21, 1959.
Decided February 26, 1959.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.