1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 173 F.Supp.
  5. 173 F.Supp. 738 (1959)
 

PANHANDLE EAST. PIPE LINE CO. v. MICHIGAN CON. GAS CO.

Civ. A. No. 7518.

173 F.Supp. 738 (1959)

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D.

May 15, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carson C. Grunewald, Detroit, Mich., William E. Miller, George B. Mickum, III, Washington, D. C., Bodman, Longley, Bogle, Armstrong & Dahling, Detroit, Mich., Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for plaintiff.

A. D. Ruegsegger, Dyer, Meek, Ruegsegger & Bullard, Detroit, Mich., for defendant.

LEVIN, District Judge.

This action by Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (hereinafter referred to as Panhandle) seeks to recover $601,354.39 from Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (hereinafter referred to as Consolidated) an amount deducted by Consolidated from amounts due to Panhandle for deliveries of gas from July 23 through October 31, 1948, hereinafter referred to as the 101-day curtailment period. Consolidated contends that this sum was lawfully withheld as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases