1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 175 F.Supp.
  5. 175 F.Supp. 726 (1959)
 

IN RE BARRY YAO COMPANY

No. 62410.

175 F.Supp. 726 (1959)

Matter of BARRY YAO COMPANY, a co-partnership consisting of Barry Baruch, aka Bill Barry and Jimmy Yao, co-partners; and Barry Baruch, aka Bill Barry, an individual; and Jimmy Yao, an individual, Bankrupts.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

August 11, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bertram S. Harris, Los Angeles, Cal., pro se.

J. E. Simpson, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent on review Francis S. Quittner.

Joseph A. Ball, Long Beach, Cal., for respondent on review Milford S. Zimmerman.

MATHES, District Judge.

Respondents move for a rehearing of the petition for review, which resulted in an order denying Messrs. Quittner and Zimmerman any compensation for their services as special counsel for the receiver on the ground that their failure to set forth fully and accurately in their petition for fees "the value and extent of the services rendered," as required by § 62, sub. d of the Bankruptcy Act, amounted to a material misrepresentation of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases