1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 179 F.Supp.
  5. 179 F.Supp. 721 (1959)
 

UNITED STATES v. BROWN SHOE COMPANY

No. 10527(3).

179 F.Supp. 721 (1959)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. BROWN SHOE COMPANY and G. R. Kinney Co., Inc., and G. R. Kinney Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

November 20, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Richards, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., James J. Coyle, Bill G. Andrews, Lewis J. Ottaviani, Nicolaus Bruns, Jr., Edward M. Medvene, Antitrust Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Robert H. McRoberts and Edwin S. Taylor, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., Arthur H. Dean, Henry N. Ess, III, Dennis C. Mahoney, Robin T. Tait, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for defendant.

WEBER, District Judge.

This is a suit by the government to restrain the proposed merger of the defendants Brown Shoe Company, Inc., and G. R. Kinney Co., Inc., and G. R. Kinney Corporation, hereinafter to be referred to as Brown and Kinney respectively. The Complaint charges a violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act1 and seeks injunctive relief under Section 15.2 Brown is a New York corporation and has its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases