1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 173 F.Supp.
  5. 173 F.Supp. 714 (1959)
 

SPERRY RAND CORP. v. BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES

173 F.Supp. 714 (1959)

SPERRY RAND CORPORATION, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly, Plaintiffs, v. BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byerly, Townsend, Watson & Churchill, New York City, for plaintiffs, C. Blake Townsend, New York City, William D. Hall, Washington, D. C., Joseph B. Forman, Carroll G. Harper, New York City, of counsel.

Henry R. Ashton, New York City, for defendant, Harry R. Pugh, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiffs to reargue the motion for leave to amend the complaint, which was previously denied by this Court in an opinion dated March 19, 1959. Reargument was granted and oral reargument has been had. Briefs have been submitted and considered. The motion presents no new facts or controlling authorities which were not fully considered by the Court in the determination of the original motion.

Essentially the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases