1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 179 F.Supp.
  5. 179 F.Supp. 638 (1959)
 

PALMQUIST v. BUHL SONS COMPANY

Nos. 18311, 18312.

179 F.Supp. 638 (1959)

Gerald J. PALMQUIST, Plaintiff, v. BUHL SONS COMPANY, Defendant. Allen DE ROSE, Plaintiff, v. BUHL SONS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D.

November 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willis Ward, Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Wurzer, Higgins & Starrs, Detroit, Mich., for defendant.

O'SULLIVAN, District Judge.

These cases were consolidated. The Court's opinion, findings and conclusions will apply to both cases.

Preliminarily, the Court will review undisputed facts, and recital thereof will constitute findings of fact, in addition to the specific findings on matters that might be considered as being in dispute.

Plaintiffs, Gerald J. Palmquist, and Allen DeRose, were, and are, employees of defendant, Buhl Sons Company. While so...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases