1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 219 Md.
  5. 219 Md. 506 (1959)
 

CONNOR v. BAYNE

[No. 181, September Term, 1958.]

219 Md. 506 (1959)

150 A.2d 445

CONNOR v. BAYNE, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for rehearing filed May 13, 1959.

Denied May 14, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson Bowie, with whom was Maurice W. Baldwin on the brief, for appellant.

Phillips L. Goldsborough, III, with whom were Clater W. Smith, Jr., and Clark, Smith & Prendergast on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND and PRESCOTT, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The point here raised on motion for summary judgment as to whether Code (1957), Art. 93, Sec. 112, is a remedial or substantive statute of limitations, is the same as that raised on demurrer and decided in Chandlee v. Shockley, 219 Md. 493. We regard that case as controlling.

Judgment affirmed, with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases