1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 356 Mich.
  5. 356 Mich. 311 (1959)
 

DOLL v. MUSKE

Docket No. 3, Calendar No. 48,049.

356 Mich. 311 (1959)

96 N.W.2d 752

DOLL v. MUSKE.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided June 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Verdonk, for plaintiffs.

Williams & Williams (Lewis R. Williams, Jr., of counsel), for defendants Muske and Heinze.

DETHMERS, C.J.

This is an action to enjoin the causing of waters to flow onto plaintiffs' land from the lands of defendants Muske and Heinze in amounts in excess of natural flowage rights or those acquired by prescription. The trial court found that plaintiffs had failed to prove such excess and entered a decree dismissing the bill of complaint. Plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs purchased their land in 1947. There was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases